Zuckerberg-funded scientists: Rein in hate on Facebook

BOSTON (AP) — Dozens of scientists doing analysis funded by Mark Zuckerberg say Facebook shouldn’t be letting President Donald Trump use the social media platform to “spread both misinformation and incendiary statements.”

The researchers, together with 60 professors at main U.S. analysis establishments, wrote the Facebook CEO on Saturday asking Zuckerberg to “consider stricter policies on misinformation and incendiary language that harms people,” particularly in the course of the present turmoil over racial injustice.

The letter calls the spread of “deliberate misinformation and divisive language” opposite to the researchers’ objectives of utilizing technology to stop and eradicate illness, enhance childhood schooling and reform the felony justice system.

Their mission “is antithetical to some of the stances that Facebook has been taking, so we’re encouraging them to be more on the side of truth and on the right side of history as we’ve said in the letter,” mentioned Debora Marks of Harvard Medical School, considered one of three professors who organized it.

The others are Martin Kampmann of the University of California-San Francisco and Jason Shepherd of the University of Utah. All have grants from a Chan Zuckerberg Initiative program working to stop, remedy and deal with neurodegenerative problems together with Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s illness.

They mentioned the letter had greater than 160 signatories. Shepherd mentioned about 10% are workers of foundations run by Zuckerberg and his spouse, Priscilla Chan.

The letter objects particularly to Zuckerberg’s resolution to not no less than flag as a violation of Facebook’s group requirements Trump’s put up that said “when the looting starts, the shooting starts” in response to unrest in Minneapolis over the videotaped killing of George Floyd, a black man, by a white police officer. The letter’s authors known as the put up “a clear statement of inciting violence.”

Also read:  Church leaders seek Home Depot boycott on Georgia voting law

Twitter had each flagged and demoted a Trump tweet utilizing the identical language.

In a press release, the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative famous that the philanthropic group is separate from Facebook and mentioned “we are grateful for our staff, partners and grantees” and “respect their right to voice their opinions, including on Facebook policies.”

Some Facebook workers have publicly objected to Zuckerberg’s refusal to take down or label deceptive or incendiary posts by Trump and different politicians. But Zuckerberg — who controls a majority of voting shares within the firm — has thus far refused.

On Friday, Zuckerberg said in a post that he would evaluation “potential options for handling violating or partially-violating content aside from the binary leave-it-up or take-it-down decisions”

“I know many of you think we should have labeled the President’s posts in some way last week,” he wrote. “Our current policy is that if content is actually inciting violence, then the right mitigation is to take that content down — not let people continue seeing it behind a flag. There is no exception to this policy for politicians or newsworthiness.”

Source: AP News

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *